I think all the enlightment and spiritual teachers have fucked up the reason on why the ego should not existed. They make it sound as if the only thing your ego will mess up is spiritual liberation and stuff.
But to tell the truth, ego will fuck up much much much much more than that.
first lets go into what exactly is your ego. In my opinion its your attachment to what you are perceived as, what your identity is.
For example, you are a respected doctor, you are a smart student, you are the cool funny guy, etc. Now you will be inclined to behave as a respected doctor or a funny guy or infact even a messed up guy because thats what your ego will identify you what.
For example, lets assume you are with your friends. They have this image of you that you are this very cool person, that you are this very smart person, and suddenly.
This chick walks past you.
By the way, this chick walks past fucking everyone, like atleast 50 dudes in the street, mall, whatever.
THEY WANT HER! THEY LUST HER! but they won't do shit!
why?
Because if they fail, their friends will laugh at him, they will make a joke about it, he will lose his cool image, I mean there is a great chance she will reject him, laugh at him, call him a loser, etc.
And his image of the 'smart guy' of the 'big guy' his overall value will be damaged in front of his friends and even himself to some extent. he will lose that 'pffft. I can't be rejected' thought he has (or atleast the image will be damaged)
So he will just smile and go home and wank while some other dude bangs the hottie above.
Sure, he spared his ego, but if we are optimistic...
There is a chance he could have won the chick and be banging her the very saturday
I mean he could have possibly had that beauty if he didn't give a shit about his image and whatsoever and taken a chance at life.
but he would rather have his comfortable position where he denies himself and just takes a look at the girl. Why? because he doesn't want a few numbnuts laughing at him or his dumb image of 'cool dude' getting ruined.
And for all you know, the girl could be the most fun chick ever, into cool music, playing cool sports, that would enrich his life big time but he didn't take the chance because he wanted to protect his image, carress his ego.
This will only lead to less awesomeness. forget the whole spiritual crap. This will take the fun out of your life because if you try there is nothing to regret whatsoever.
The Almighty Vinesh Hath Spoken!
Monday, November 16, 2009
Ego, the greatest enemy to... AWESOMENESS.
Posted by Vinesh Panditpotra at 11:17 AM 0 comments
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
A REAL Tribute to India.
For all you non-indians (and indians), I want to show you the real glory of India.
Not the slum Children, not the overcrowded trains and malnourished dying kids and old women with diseases but the real India.
The real India carries a legend which can make most of you pee your pants a thousand times over.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Buddha_in_Sarnath_Museum_(Dhammajak_Mutra).jpg





So never EVER think of us indians as poor.
we've probably rolled and balled so much, that our ancestors had fun points which would last well into 2500 AD.
And this current state you see in the movies is not us, its just temporary till we get back on our feet after the disgusting islamic invaders and faggot britishers had their lil invasions.
And to make things better for you.
India is responsible for the invention of zero, so we gave the vital to you using this computer to read this post. without us, you'd be friggin hillbillies and to top it off, we also were directly responsible for all the conciousness movements (zen, tantra, yoga), we'll get right back up so keep your sympathy to yourself and get back to your trailer and finish fucking your cousin or beating your wives, whatever suits you best.
Posted by Vinesh Panditpotra at 11:13 PM 0 comments
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Ancient Astronauts Theory: BULL!
There is an interesting theory out there.
It says aliens came and fucked the original homo sapien women, which caused smarter generations to come ahead. This is pointed by the fact that before 6000 years, we were pretty much caveman and suddenly we started building pyramids and doing badass stuff.
So the conclusion by the brain trust was: ALIENS! FUCKING!
There is more to the theory, they believe suddenly cultures were building pyramids and all of a sudden, they stopped too.
Also they point out that a lot of ancient monuments seemed like signposts or made interesting shapes if viewed by Bird's Eye.
Now, I think this is retarded.
I am sure in 6000BC everyone = caveman and in 5999 BC everyone = pyramid dude wasn't the case.
Similarly, back in 1995, cellphones were relatively rare, expensive and internet pretty much did not exist.
In 2005, you could get GPS, streaming video on your cellphone and also be updated on live events via twitter. Not to mention you could take a picture with a 2 inch device and spread it all over the world.
Similarly in computers, within just the span of a generation, we are going from the 8 bit nintendo game to the 360 bit PS3 games and new PC games. not to mention a host of other badass things, I mean we are using computers to remote control two fucking robots all the way in mars
Now the logical conclusion would be: all the engineers and guys at NASA had their moms fucked by an alien.
well, maybe.
because its just a span of 20 years after all.
As for the monuments to impress someone watching from the sky. partially right but the idea of it being aliens is kind of odd. In all mythology/religion, Gods are said to 'rule up there' or 'up in the heavens'
Now one may use the ancient astronaut theory and say: u fkin n00b! alienz were da godz! datz why the whole thing.
Now what a lot of people do not understand is that in religions, people describe purity as 'ascension' or going up. There is a reason behind this (no. not aliens), the reason is that fire always goes upwards and that is also a poetic way of saying 'that which is ABOVE us all'
And imagine it this way, I am sure alien dudes are attracted to alien chicks, why earth chicks.
I mean would you fuck an alien chick?
So unless the aliens out there have crazy ass japanese anime fetish, I really can't figure this thing here.
Posted by Vinesh Panditpotra at 11:36 PM 0 comments
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Greek Philosophy and Life.
Greek: Life is a battlefield.
A lot of ambitious guys might agree with life being a battlefield. But you know, the philosophy doesn't even remotely indicate that 'life must be a battlefield for those who want to win' but rather more like:
'You are in a battlefield whether you like it or not'
This includes everyone: Gandhi, John Lennon, You, Me, Freddie Mercury.
Why?
I know you are just a peaceful dude who wants to live his life and just chill with no violent intentions whatsoever.
Well, look at this way: Lets assume you find a beautiful lover and have a great time.
Umm... what does that indicate? Someone else is not having your beautiful lover.
And at the same time, the hot couple... either could have had someone else. This is just a singular example. Lets assume you get a promotion, someone else isn't getting it. If not for you, someone else would get the promotion.
If there are no servants, there are no bosses. If you are a famous band, you have outdone some other band to get where you are.
If you look at it even deeper, we all consume life on a daily basis.
Trees and plants are all alive (since they grow?) and we chew them (This is assuming you are not a meat eater).
Deers eat living plants, Tigers eat living deers. At the end of the day, everyone wants to be a tiger, who can never be hunted but can hunt relentlessly.
So keep your peaceful ideas to yourself since you so murderously munch on living plants and stuff. I mean, come on! Don't deny the obvious! You want to be someone big time! You want beautiful lovers and stuff! You are extremely violent to begin with.
The moment you have the desire to have an awesome car, to have a big house, to have hot lovers, etc. You are already violent because you want to get ahead in the race defeating someone.
So should you stop all your desires? Are you a prick for having them? NO! Its our very nature, its our very frame. We are meant to be violent, we are meant to outdo others and win.
Back in the day an alpha cave man just got a club and beat the fuck out of a beta caveman and took his chicks and hunting spots. It was way more simplified and honest, nothing personal!
And the same factor continues to this day: Only its substituted by things like money, power, looks, charisma, social conditioning, brains and luck. Its a complicated mess which is made to look pretty, like if you put cute bunny ears over a fucking cobra!
I know a lot of them think 'what if I am born without money, looks, luck and awesome enviornment, does it mean I am screwed?'
Well, Yes and No.
We have to first look into social conditioning, Lets assume two examples: John and Jack.
Both subjects have equal finances, equal looks, equal IQ.
John's parents are very pessimistic and often discouraging. He is in a religious catholic school which is extremely oppressive.
Jack's parents are total cool dudes, they are extremely optimistic and encourage Jack. He attends a pretty cool school.
They both are now 23 and are giving a job interview.
John is nervous because he has been discouraged, John can't freely speak his mind out of habit of being in an oppressive school. His confidence is eventually low.
Jack has the exact opposite case because of the exact opposite circumstance and gets the job.
This means there was no real merit but luck on Jack's part to be born where he was born.
If you are to directly compare this to the battlefield, lets assume a warrior who has got the coolest armour (money), wicked sword (looks+charima), great teacher (social conditioning), great genes (luck) and a strong helmet (brains) VS someone without those attributes.
It indicates that it will be much harder for the latter, NOT IMPOSSIBLE and if he wants to win his freedom, make money or the sort, he has to kill his opponent and learn, take his armour, its just a different level of difficulty.
Posted by Vinesh Panditpotra at 7:38 AM 0 comments
Friday, August 21, 2009
Friday, August 14, 2009
How to get your parents off your back
I know you must be going 'I really really want to get my parents off my back'
Its extremely annoying when they interfere with every little thing you do.
really riles you up, eh?
but here's the thing: It shouldn't.
Parents are usually on your back for two primary reasons:
1.) They Think you can't handle your own life.
2.) They believe they have complete possession over you and that all your actions need their approval before being completed.
Now before we get started, I want you to figure out which one of the two (or both) suits your situation the most.
For Parents who think you can't handle your own life:
Well, there is a very simple solution to this:
MAN UP! (or woman up!)
You have to show your parents that you can take responsibility and that you don't need them, this can be very rewarding too in terms of mooching off:
1.) Do not complain in front of your parents
2.) Do not allow your parents (or anyone) to yell at you
3.) Make your own decisions, learn to say no.
4.) Set your boundaries and show acts of responsibility
5.) Treat your parents like you treat a friend.
I'll tell you why this works:
For Guys: Fathers expect their kids to be 'real men' and when their kids fail to show the ability to take responsibility, THEY feel like failures.
Its a very genetic thing, everyone has high hopes for their children, one of them is that the kid would be like the most dominating or alpha child in the society, group, etc.
And simple signs of being dominant and responsible are not complaining, making boundaries, making your own decisions, not cowering.
You also have to make sure you don't sound like a wimp while talking to your friends.
Similarly, Mothers expect their sons to be the kind of tough guy who takes responsibility for everything and is decisive.
Its actually a trait all women appreciate in men, the decisiveness and the toughness, if that becomes apparent, the parents would be very pleased, they would assume they raised superman himself.
I mean, imagine a mom going 'my SON just does what his friends tell him to and gets yelled at by us'
doesn't it feel very sad?
So remember, if you so much as set your boundaries and make it clear, not by words but by action:
Get off my back, I can handle my shit.
The parents would be more than happy to oblige, actually very proud.
For Girls:
Well, one fear all moms have is that a girl would just run away with a random loser, get pregnant and stuff because girls are often driven by:
EMOTION.
I mean, when you hear your favourite music, have you noticed YOU CAN'T HELP BUT DANCE.
This can be traced all the way back in the prehistoric times, girls were supposed to mate with the strongest guys but if they were emotionally driven enough, a random douche could get lucky and this was bad for the girl and her lineage.
Similarly, keeping this in regard... mostly parents would be on your back to make sure you don't make mistakes which could prove really bad.
Now, there are two way around this:
1.) Good Girl Act:
you just gotta act, act like someone who always thinks about the future and is very sacred.
Someone who won't make the wrong decisions, won't smoke, won't drink, is the prime example of 'sacred'
what this means is: Be nasty but don't get caught.
2.) High Standards:
What this indicates is that you gotta do things only which are important, by this what I mean is that you should not talk to losers in front of your parents.
You should not talk to stoners, drunks and hos while your parents or friends of your parents can watch.
This also indicates that you should have a watch or a control over your emotional outbursts:
you shouldn't go like: OMIGOOOSHHHH! WOW!!! ITS DANIEL CRAIG!!! I JUST LOVE HIM!!! OOOH!
What that indicates in a way is that you are easy prey for a Daniel Craig Lookalike.
You have to show that a new bag, new jeans, a poodle or whatever wouldn't be strong enough to completely make you wobble.
its a justified fear actually.
So you gotta act like a really really high standards girl to the point that you won't react even to your parents.
That is how a girl could her parents off her back
Case 2: Getting Authoritative parents off your back.
Now authoritative/possessive parents have an entirely different reason for getting on your back than normal parents.
The reason they tend to be so commanding is that they like to be valued.
If you notice keenly, the very possessive parents likely do not posses any authority outside of their families.
From my observations, such parents are usually from a low-middle income background and do not have many friends/admirers and as a natural outburst of that, they tend to be forceful and demand respect.
Ironically, although they may seem too dominant, they are actually the first to cower when they realize that they cannot use their authority on their target.
So your simple response to such a parent is rebellion
By rebellion I don't mean shouting back but simply disobeying the rules they set for you.
I know its kinda scary but trust me, the possessive parents are usually bluffing, even if you hear their stories... you will notice how highly exaggerated they are.
Now as for the reaction, when they shout at you, imagine a beggar or a McDonald's worker in their place.
Treat them like dirt, make them feel like they are worth no respect and value.
Ignore them like you ignore a beggar asking for change.
They will start unleashing their fury on others thereafter.
And because they cannot get to you, they will get off your back, the last thing they want is damage on their ego.
So this is my opinion on how to get parents off your back.
Posted by Vinesh Panditpotra at 9:29 AM 0 comments
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Gandhi: Father of the nation? FUCK GANDHI!
Father of the Nation.
Pretty powerful title to carry.
as a lot of you know, Mohandas Gandhi was a person who advocated peace, non-violence and stuff.
I think thats bullshit.
Gandhi used to fast to death until his demands were met.
Like Osho said, thats not non-violent, thats absurdly violent! thats blackmail!
How is that considered peaceful?
And even so,
If you look at the facts, it was the post World War II Atlee Government that made all the efforts to give India its independance.
But if you look at it from my perspective:
The British took a lot of national treasures from India
They literally robbed all the farmers and made beggars out of them.
Is that even remotely justified?
And are we supposed to be non-violent about it?
If you ask me, there is a time to be non-violent and there is a time to be violent.
If by being non-violent, we are letting injustice happen and the ends result in a lot of damage, the non-violence is worth shit.
And at the same time if we have only violence and no brains we would become a very backward and a very ignorant country.
I think both have their place and time.
One thing I can never respect is a poor frail weak man being revered as 'the father of the nation'
Being in such a shameful state, he is the last person that should be made as a role model for the generations to come.
A role model should be a strong, wealthy and a very happy man.
I mean, if the leader is so frail and weak, what does it say about the country.
as a saying goes:
It is better to have a wolf for a leader guiding an army of sheep rather than having an army of wolves guided by a sheep.
And to add insult to injury, this man Gandhi probably had no knowledge of the ancient culture of India.
Speaking on subjects like Celibacy, non-violence, purity of means...
Our culture created Kamasutra and we were the ones who sent Alexander the Great packing his bags to Greece so spare me the bullshit about culture.
Heck, if you read the Bhagavad Gita and know about Shiva.
Destruction of the evil is very much a part of our culture.
Gandhi has often claimed 'the gita is my mother'
crap! Gita pretty much emphasizes that people are immortal anyway so its okay to kill when the need arises.
And even the legends point to destroying those who commit crimes rather than holding our dicks and talkng about non-violence.
My two cents,
vinesh panditpotra.
Posted by Vinesh Panditpotra at 3:40 PM 0 comments
Labels: father of the nation, gandhi, gandhi india, M K Gandhi, mohandas gandhi
